Working paper Tier B Women's Finance

Weathering the Shock

Women's Financial Capability and Recovery After Life Events

Student + Balloch (supervisor)

Weathering the Shock

Abstract

Women face systematically higher rates of financial hardship than men following negative life events (divorce, widowhood, severe illness, job loss) and the gap survives pre-event income, education, and household-composition controls. Australian women, in particular, enter and exit hardship spells at higher rates than men with comparable pre-event resources, suggesting that the gap is not merely a consequence of disparate exposure to events but a consequence of differential recovery from events that both genders experience.

This paper frames **financial capability** as shock armour: a practical behavioural resource that distinguishes deliberate from reactive financial behaviour and that, when present, reduces the depth or duration of hardship after a life event. The construct is distinct from financial literacy (information stock) and from liquid wealth (income-smoothing capacity); it captures the non-cognitive, skill-level resources that govern whether deliberate financial action survives high-cognitive-load conditions such as a sudden separation or illness.

The empirical setting is a national household panel linked to the ANZ Financial Wellbeing Survey financial-capability scale, across the post-2016 waves that fielded the capability measure, with event-specific subsamples for divorce and widowhood. The existing analysis applies an already-rich identification stack: OLS with panel fixed-effects, instrumental-variable estimation, Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition, Oster endogeneity bounds, Cox proportional-hazards modelling for hardship-spell duration, Imai-Keele mediation analysis for the income-mediator channel, and a latent-class analysis of capability profiles. The existing classical evidence already identifies financial capability as a measurable buffer against women's life-event-induced hardship.

We propose extending the existing analysis with two further ML layers: a Causal Forest CATE estimator that would recover the conditional capability effect by life-event type, gender, and pre-event hardship history, and a Random Survival Forest that would estimate hardship-spell duration without the proportional-hazards constraint. The proposed extensions would distinguish whether divorce and job-loss events, rather than widowhood, are the contexts in which the capability buffer concentrates, and supply event-type-specific intervention recommendations for women's financial-education programmes.

Data & Methods

Data Source
National household panel linked to ANZ Financial Wellbeing Survey financial-capability scale, with event-specific subsamples for divorce and widowhood
Methods (existing)
OLS; instrumental-variable / 2SLS; panel fixed-effects; Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition; Oster endogeneity bounds; Cox proportional-hazards; Imai–Keele mediation analysis; latent-class analysis of capability profiles
Proposed extensions
Causal Forest CATE by life-event type; Random Survival Forest for hardship-spell duration (planned extensions to existing latent-class + mediation analysis; not yet implemented)
Primary target
Review of Economics of the Household (fallback: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Journal of Banking & Finance)
ResearchGate (forthcoming) Discuss this paper